Week 4, post#4

Functional Theory
The functional theory model in the group dynamic seems pretty straightforward. I can see how this theory can lead to a working system of decision-making processes. The idea that the group makes a series of smaller decisions, that eventually lead to the positive movement of the goals intended seems rather logical. However, serving on many committees (groups) over the years on various projects has caused me to look at this theory a little closer. Obviously when I was working on these committees I didn’t have the hindsight of Organizational Communications study to determine whether the function of the group was beneficial or detrimental to solving the problems set forth.

What I do know is that my experience in these groups has given me some confidence in knowing what seems to work and what doesn’t. The four points about Functional Theory: Assessing the problem; Specifying goals; Identifying possible solutions; and Evaluating the positive and negative features of the alternatives, provide a working structure of locating solutions that any group or committee could use to help in offering some direction.

What I think is truly important is that the leader of this group needs to have some idea of organized communications in order for the group to succeed without too many obstacles (mainly their own lack of communications). The groups need to have a process where ideas are formulated and then discussed; arguments are addressed; and solutions are offered. If this system of communication is not provided for this group at the outset, then the series of smaller decisions will take longer to become solutions and the group concept will lead to an autonomous decision-making process. The group will become an official stamp of approval for the leader who lacked the organization skills to work collaboratively.